Modesty. Even just typing the word
makes the back of my neck itch like I'm in a wool jumper. I recently
fell into the modesty blog world several months ago when I was home
sick from work and in my boredom, doing some extensive googling. I
was intrigued, amused, slightly repulsed and found myself wondering
how even though I appear to be theologically very similar to a number
of these bloggers, we are clearly at opposite ends of the fashion
spectrum.
Now if I was going to choose my
religion based solely on modesty blogs I would be Mormon. That sounds
flippant I know, but Mormon bloggers seem to have the modest yet
fashionable lifestyle locked down. They follow fashion and its
trends, they take inspiration from popular high end designers, but
they also know how to carefully edit their outfits so they are not
trashtastic or frumpy. Many times when reading conservative Christian
fashion blogs there seems to be an element of shame attached to the
way women are supposed to dress. And before I get accused of
“attacking” people let me be clear that the women and girls who
have these blogs appear to be lovely Godly individuals.
But I read things on these blogs and in
the comment sections that baffle and infuriate me. How if you are
showing your collarbones your shirt is too low. Why you ask? Because
men are attracted to collarbones. Men also are enthralled by kneecaps
apparently, because every skirt should be always below the knee if
not to the ankles, and if there is any possible way that someone, aka
a MAN! may be able to even slightly determine that you have two
breasts and not a swaddled up mono boob then clearly, you madam, are
a strumpet. Let us not even mention how seeing the outline of a
woman's leg and or butt in a pair of trousers sends men everywhere
running for their prayer closets.
Most modest fashion bloggers state that
they have their blogs in order to convey that yes! It is possible to
dress in a modest, yet feminine and attractive way, that is also God
glorifying. They state that modesty is far more an issue of the heart
than of outward appearance. These ideas are ones I can get behind and
applaud with vigor. I too love Jesus, and I too wish to dress in a
way that glorifies God, but as with many other concepts in life it is
the practical application of this idea that ends with me standing on
my doorstep shaking a blouse in one hand, skirt in the other, and
screeching, “I have nothing to wear!”
Probably the most common Bible verses
used to support modest dressing are 1 Timothy 2:9 and Deuteronomy
22:5. Let's talk about the verse in Deuteronomy first. There is no
consensus about what this verse means, try googling this verse and
reading some blog posts, it gets a little cray cray. What people do
agree on is that this verse is dealing with gender differences in
clothing, but everything else is up for grabs. Some view this as a
statement that women should not dress in the battle gear of a man,
that the verse is discussing women not being in the military. Another
interpretation is that we are not allowed to be transvestites. But
the explanation I saw most often on modesty blogs was the assumption
that the passage prohibits women from wearing pants, because they are
a masculine article of clothing.
Ok, let's take a little trip down logic
lane. So 99% of these bloggers acknowledge that men and women during
OT Israel wore the same exact tunics, the only differences being
ornamentation and styling. Somehow though many of these bloggers next
conclusion is that all of a sudden men started wearing pants, while
women wore dresses and skirts, and that is the way it has been until
the evils of feminism (among other things) made their way into our
culture. There is no basis to support that pants are some historical
gift to men and men only. If you persist in this viewpoint you should
probably add makeup, jewelry, high-heels, and stockings, to the list
of things for men to wear. I'm sure that this statement could be
controversial, but I have actually done extensive research and
written papers on, to name a few, the history of high heeled shoes,
and the makeup practices of the Egyptians, and men wore both, even in
“Western Christian countries”. The spread of pants across Europe
has more to do with the Mongols and riding horses with ease as they
waged war, then any kind of mandate from God. Also I would like to
point out that in Genesis 3, when God clothed Adam and Eve after the
fall, he did so with the exact same garment, tunics of skin. He
didn't specify pants of skin for Adam and a dress of skin for Eve. If
we are going to consider scripture in our clothing choices we need to
consult all of it.
1 Timothy 2:9 is the verse that says
women should adorn themselves with modest apparel and not with
braided hair or pearls or jewels. The context of this verse deals
with how women should conduct themselves at a worship service to God.
The duties of men in worship have just been listed and now the same
thing is being done for women. So yes women, don't dress
inappropriately for the worship service. In my mind this means don't
be immodest, but also don't wear an evening dress to worship, because
a church service is not the right place for that garment. Reading
modesty blogs, many of them seem to ignore the worship context this
verse has, and apply it with quite the liberally painted brush to
every area of life. Please don't misunderstand me, there is nothing
wrong with trying to find application in our daily lives with this
text, but I do believe that a distinction can be made in what we wear
to church and what we wear during the rest of the week. Also some
very odd conclusions have been made on blogs about what this verse is
saying. More than once I've read that because this verse tells women
to be modest that means no clothing that shows any leg over the knee,
the back, any of the chest below the collarbones, the shoulders,
upper arms, and if a woman wears pants she must have a long tunic or
short dress covering her behind. Some say the Apostle Paul instructs
women to be covered in loose garments from neck to ankle. Another
wrote on their blog that they will not wear jewelry because that is
what prostitutes in biblical times wore.
Now I don't like to get all super duper
specific with my “fashion rules”, which I'm sure surprises
absolutely no one. The only time I adhere to more set list of
guidelines is on Sundays for church since I feel, as I stated above,
there is biblical precedence for it. I tend to wear no denim, higher
necklines, no sleeveless, skirts to the knee, and lower heels. I have
sky high heels aplenty and many a skirt that lands above my knees,
but I classify those as party clothing. Church is many wonderful
things including joy filled and celebratory but it is not a party,
even though there is alcohol and the occasional rowdy song.
When I went through my super duper
hardcore modesty blog reading phase I found myself viewing women in a
different way that I had before. Even though I didn't agree with many
of the ideas I was reading, I had still absorbed them and was
starting to see women as nothing more than a collection of body parts
that were or were not “immodest”. She's not showing her knees but
she has a tanktop on! You can see her bra strap! OMG I think I just
caught a glimpse of her cleavage! Instead of looking a woman in the
face and seeing the individual she was, I was looking at her body to
see if I could find something to judge. Dismissing somebody as a
possible friend before they have ever even spoken a word to me. God
created us in HIS image, I think that fact by itself should give us a
lot to ponder before we pronounce judgment on someone we have never
met, let alone our friends and family. Our
bodies are not shameful. God created us naked. Only after our sin did
we become clothed. If Adam and Eve had not fallen what would have
happened with humans wearing/not wearing clothing? It is not clothing
that makes us holy.
My standard for dress it to have R E S
P E C T. For myself, and for the Lord. I want to honor God and feel
great about the way I look. I don't believe that those two statements
are mutually exclusive.
Basically that sums it up, but I would
like to address a few other topics I frequently read on these blogs
and throw in some miscellaneous thoughts I have on modesty.
There
is an oft quoted line, "we are to be set apart from the world".
This is taken to mean that you should pay absolutely no attention to
what is going on in the world in terms of fashion, and that you
should dress very differently so as to make it completely obvious
just how different you are. Make it so obvious that people stop and
stare at you and occasionally maybe even laugh at you or poke fun or
even sneer, because then you will know you are doing something right
because if you are being righteous you will be reviled! Righteous and
Reviled is my new 80's throwback alternative band name BTW, copyright
now.
So I think we need to be careful here. More than likely if you are very openly a Christian at some point you will be made fun of. For most Christians living in Western countries mean words are about at far as it will go. People will make fun of you for being committed to abstinence, for not watching porn, for believing in creationism, for reading your Bible, maybe for being homeschooled, or for not doing drugs. Being criticized for a behavior does not automatically make that behavior right.
So I think we need to be careful here. More than likely if you are very openly a Christian at some point you will be made fun of. For most Christians living in Western countries mean words are about at far as it will go. People will make fun of you for being committed to abstinence, for not watching porn, for believing in creationism, for reading your Bible, maybe for being homeschooled, or for not doing drugs. Being criticized for a behavior does not automatically make that behavior right.
And
now let us discuss men lusting. From the amount of times the lust of
men is referenced on modesty blogs one would assume that men have no
time to get anything done because they are too busy drooling over any
women they walk by, or see on TV, or catch a glimpse of in a
magazine. I am not going to argue that men don't like visual stimuli,
the enormity of the porn industry proves they do. Yes men lust after
women, I agree. However I think that telling a woman to not wear
something because men may lust after her is not the best response to
a garment, and should not be anyone's first response. If you wish to
honor God and respect yourself with your clothing choices, I don't
think you will need to torture yourself with endless questions about
if every garment you own will cause a man to stumble. Is there
anything wrong with considering other people, male and female, when
you make clothing choices? No, but don't make potential lust your
constant companion when staring into your closet.
If
you have felt convicted by Jesus to only wear long skirts, or loose
high-necked shirts, to not put on high-heels, and to wear minimal or
no makeup, I support your belief. I would not want a woman to violate
her conscious because I think there is nothing inappropriate about a
pair of leopard print jeans. But you do not have the biblical
authority to tell me that heels over two inches are sinful, that a
pair of jeans means I do not know the love of Jesus. I could write
much more about the eye and the plank and the removing it before the
flapping of the gums begins but I think I'm done with the whole
modesty business! Well... let me just leave you with a final random
thought.
Please note: leggings do not make any
dress or skirt longer, they are not magical garments found in Harry
Potter, they simply cover your legs. People can still see your legs
and how short your skirt is. A public service announcement since
apparently many MANY people cannot grasp this concept.
XOXO Abbs
"OMG" means "oh my God" right?
ReplyDelete^^^ Is this the ONLY thing you gathered from this well-written article?
ReplyDeleteIts the only question i had.
DeleteThank you for the public service announcement! Very timely!
ReplyDelete"Even though I didn't agree with many of the ideas I was reading, I had still absorbed them and was starting to see women as nothing more than a collection of body parts that were or were not “immodest”...Instead of looking a woman in the face and seeing the individual she was, I was looking at her body to see if I could find something to judge."
ReplyDeleteThank you for saying this. This is pretty much the definition of objectification! Imagine what it's like to be a young man growing up in these cultures when both the outside world and the church not only encourage but expect him to objectify women - in surprisingly similar ways!
We as a church owe it to our younger brothers and sisters to do better than modesty rules and "be careful little eyes what you see" as a discussion of sexuality.
Another interesting take on the topic here: http://www.churchleaders.com/pastors/pastor-articles/164005-emily-maynard-modesty-rules-is-a-woman-responsible-lust.html?p=2
Seconded--your point about modesty and objectification is fantastic. Great post.
ReplyDeleteLove the leggings point! I've thought the same thing... kinda odd how some people seem to think they are a magical cure all...
ReplyDelete